Thanks to those 800 + members who attended the State Meeting in San Antonio. Your football Board of Directors continues to look for ways to increase attendance at the State Meeting, especially by the less experienced members of the organization who probably stand to gain the most from attending. If you have any ides as to how to increase attendance, please get them to your District Director or post here.
Special recognition is due to Beau Hicks who was at his 56th State Meeting, an incredible accomplishment!
There were some rules issues discussed at different points during the meeting which indicated possible confusion regarding proper rulings so we will attempt to clear those up here. If you are aware of any others which popped up in any of the breakouts, please share them with us.
1 – Enforcement of penalties for Team A fouls during kicks when there is also an illegal touch by Team A. As many members correctly noted, when Team B chooses to enforce the penalty for Team A’s foul, they give up the right to take the ball at the spot of illegal touching (6-1-3-c and 6-3-6-a). However, sometimes a kick will become dead in the possession of the kicking team but it actually will BELONG to the receiving team, i.e a free kick, untouched by receivers which is caught/recovered by kickers before ball went 10 yards (6-1-6-a) or a scrimmage kick that has crossed the neutral zone and is untouched by the receivers beyond the neutral zone (6-3-6-a). In these cases, since the dead ball actually BELONGS to Team B, penalties can be enforced from that spot. While accepting a penalty negates the right for receivers to take the ball at the spot of illegal touching it does not negate the right to take the ball at the spot of “illegal recovery” (10-2-4). Rom Gilbert has done a great 1-page summary of play situations covering these types of plays. You can see it at Rom Gilbert’s Page. Some other rule references which might help explain the ruling are 5-1-1-b, 5-1-1-c, 5-1-4-b, 5-1-4-f.
2- During discussion of the new rule regardng intentional grounding (i.e. the passer can simply throw the ball to “the area” of an eligible receiver and avoid an intentional grounding foul), the question arose as to how far from the eligible receiver is still considered to be in “the area” . Thanks to Dotson Lewis for pointing out a recent CFO Bulletin which may incorrectly cause some to judge that “magic distance” to be 7 yards. The following is the section of the Bulletin he refers to:
“There is not, nor will there ever be, an exact yardage distance between the receiver and where the pass lands that will absolutely determine whether a foul has been committed. That distance can vary significantly based on the circumstances of the play and the direction of the pass. This phrase “direction of the pass” is emphasized as it provides the crucial piece of evidence that allows us to determine the “intentional” aspect of the play. For example, the quarterback in the pocket throws the ball toward eligible receiver A88 who is five yards downfield, but the pass lands seven yards short directly in front of A88. This would not be a foul. However, if the pass is thrown away from A88 and lands seven yards to his left as A88 crosses to the right, this would indeed be a foul. Note: seven yards is used simply as an example—it is not intended to be “the yardage guideline.” In making this determination, officials are to use “direction of the pass” to judge how far away from an eligible receiver the ball must be before calling a foul. We should stretch this distance as much as reasonably possible based on the direction of the pass. For a foul to be called it should be clear to everyone that the passer throws the ball into an area not occupied by an eligible receiver. Do not be overly technical.”
As the Bulletin notes, we should NOT use 7 yards as the distance at all times which will be used to judge “in the area.” In some plays, that might be the proper distance to use. But not in others.
The Bulletin correctly notes the intentional grounding call will now require even more crew communication than previously as the R will rarely be able to assess the distance the ball is from an eligible receiver since he must maintain coverage of the QB who was under pressure when he threw so is at risk for being fouled after the pass.
Thanks again to those who joined us in San Antonio. Plan now to attend next year’s meeting which will be in McAllen and the 2013 meeting, planned for Dallas.